Every Saturday @ 5 pm Pacific
Sunday @5 pm Pacific
Education by ed
All government officials and agencies, including all State legislatures, are bound by the Constitution and Shall NOT create any defacto 1871 Act, 1933 banking act laws which counter the Constitution: The U.S. Supreme Court, in 1895, ruled unconstitutional a federal law... containing unlawful income taxes, senate and house Bills ones birth certificate , statutes and codes with arguments concerning class warfare and the definition of a direct tax. "Herein...Ohio's Doctrine of Governmental Immunity was held unconstitutional and others to numerous to mention." (Civil Rights) (Krause vs Ohio, app 2d 1 L.N.W. 2d 321 1971.) Reich vs State Highway Dept. 336, Mich 617: 194 N.W. 2d 700 197"Employees of a city or state are not immune from suit under statute relating civil rights for deprivations of rights on ground that officials were acting within the scope of their ground that officials were acting within the Scope of their responsibilities of performing a discretionary act." (Bunch vs Barnett 376 F.Sup. 23.)"Title 28 Section 1391, this section makes it possible to bring actions against government officials and agencies in district court outside D.C." (Civil Rights) (Norton vs Mcshane 14 L.Ed. 2d 274.)A suit in detinue or replevin in personam should lie to gain possession of property seized by the state. (Civil Rights) Stephen, Pleading (3rd Am ed) p. 47, 52, 69, 74; Ames Lectures on legal history, p. 64, 71; Wilkins v. Despard, 5 Term Rep- 112; Roberts v. Withered, % Mod. 193, 12 Mod. 92.
go here for site.
I don't know how many can hear or comprehend this.... But we STAND strong, we STAND our ground, we STAND for our rights. Standing is strength, standing is a sign of a living, thinking, Man or Woman.
Kneeling is a sign of worship, submission, defeat......
So Stand or kneel?
So Free or Slave
So Living or Dead? ( even if it is a short life you still lived)
your decision... are you a living man or woman, or are you Chattel for those who claim ownership over you?
Lawful Bloodline Americans
this is why it has to be done in Admiralty law: In Title 28 U.S.C. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, in the chapter and section that defines “court,” “debt,” “judgment,” and “United States” (Chapter 176 Federal Debt Collection Procedure, Section 3002), “United States” means a Federal corporation (28 U.S.C. 3002(15)).Title 28 United States Code” means, literally, Title 28 District of Columbia Municipal Corporation Code.the states and district courts are all run by privately hired corporation.. we are treated in court as: Executive Order 6 and 7 Vol XV app-45 Only has signature of the Secretary of the state (William H Seward) Andrew Johnson the president was against the 14th Amendment He stated it creates a DEFACTO GOVERNMENT. Then, in 1868, the 14th Amendment created a different citizen making all “PERSONS”, corporations, citizens of the “UNITED STATES” and “SUBJECT TO” the “JURISDICTION” “THEREOF”.
Contact Ed for info on buying plastic, metal, signs and Decals, also available on shirts. Will only sell and ship to the lower 48 states of America due to international Commerce Tax regulations we will not participate in.
Edward M Johnston Has Filed in State of Oregon secretary office including this filed with the senate and house as you can see, Not one of the Elected and Public servants have disagree with the facts this public notice published for three weeks in the newspapers , public notice boards and museums please read https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2015R1/Downloads/CommitteeMeetingDocument/72439
The Wall Of Trump
Just Got Paid off!
STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION
All “Judges” are lawfully required by 28 USC 372 to have an “Oath of Office”. Ask the “Judge” if he/she has an “Oath of Office”. If yes, accept the “Oath of Office” in “Admiralty Jurisdiction”. Now the “Judge” is subject to criminal prosecution and civil litigation for any injury he/she may cause you. If no, the attorney is not a judge and has no lawful authority to proceed. Your State Representative should be informed by “Petition for Impeachment of Judge”. Present the facts of the case, the law is not necessary. Have it notarized and send it by Certified Mail. As we remove the unlawful judges, lawful judges will take their place
Without Prejudice All Rights Reserved UCC I 207 . I -308 Lawful Bloodline Native American Confidentiality Notice:
I am not an attorney, medical professional or financial adviser and all the exchanges contained in this email are for personal use only. This private email message, including any attachment[s] is limited to the sole use of the intended recipient[s] and may contain Privileged and/or Confidential Information. Any and All Political, Private or Public Entities, Federal, State, or Local Corporate Government[s] , et. al.,and/or Third Party[ies] working in collusion by collecting and/or monitoring My email[s] and collecting these communications Without my Exclusive Permission are Barred from Any and All Unauthorized Review,Use, Disclosure or Distribution. With Explicit Reservation of All My Rights, Without Prejudice and Without Recourse to Me, Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rights & Reserved Rights. It is my hope that the things within this email are a blessing unto every reader without exception, for I desire peaceful co-existence with ALL!
An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no right; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs Shelby County118 US 425 p.442 *Confidentiality Notice. *The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this “Message,” including attachments. The originator intended this Message for the specified recipients only; it may contain the originator’s confidential and proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies unintended recipients that they have received this Message in error, and strictly proscribes their Message review, dissemination,
Notice: All Rights Reserved. Permission to distribute for non-commercial purposes is hereby granted, in whole or part, provided attribution and a link to this article is included. Commercial distribution without the written permission of the author is prohibited. This Public email message, including any attachment(s) is limited to the sole use of the intended recipient and may contain Privileged and/or Confidential Information. Any and All Political, Private or Public Entities, Federal, State, or Local Corporate Government(s), Municipality(ies), International Organizations, Corporation(s), agent(s), investigator(s), or informant(s), et. al., and/or Third Party(ies) working in collusion by collecting and/or monitoring My email(s),and any other means of spying and collecting these Communications Without my Exclusive Permission are Barred from Any and All Unauthorized Review, Use, Disclosure or Distribution. With Explicit Reservation of All My Rights,Without Prejudice and Without Recourse to Me. Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rights or Reserved Rights Notice. *The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this “Message,” including attachments. The originator intended this Message for the specified recipients only; it may contain the originator’s confidential and proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies unintended recipients that they have received this Message in error, and strictly proscribes their Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Recipients-in-error shall notify the originator immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. Authorized lawful bloodline Americans aka lawful Americans carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch. Anything stated in this email may be limited in the content and is not to be taken out of context.**Wireless Copyright Notice**. Federal and State laws govern copyrights to this Message. You must have the originator’s full written consent to alter, copy, or use this Message.Originator acknowledges others’ copyrighted content in this Message. Otherwise Without Prejudice and Without Recourse to Me. Any omission does not constitute a waiver of any and/or ALL Intellectual Property Rights or Reserved Rights U.C.C.1-308. NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS. NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS good video !!! ROMAN J ISRAEL, ESQ v HIMSELF !!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rewoGore Education Information on Lawful Bloodline Native American http://new.oregontrackers.com
Justice Department warns local courts about illegal enforcement of fees and fines
Judge Rules Administrative Court System Illegal After 81 Years
Judge Rules that Government Debt is Covered by FDCPA, Forcing Collection Agency to Defend
No News is Good News
Never submit Motions, that is assent granting the corporate courts Jurisdiction over you and waives your inherant sovereign rights. Sovereigns do not "submit" to any authority outside of the common law. Authority – AFFIDAVIT V. MOTION Bench: I have considered the Defense Motions & they are all DENIED. Real Man: I did not file any motions, I filed affidavits. Bench: Well I am treating your documents as motions!! Real Man: AGAIN, I did not file any motions, I filed affidavits; it is a criminal offense to file a false affidavit, I notice I am not under arrest for filing a false affidavit so it is clear that my affidavits are true, correct, and accurate; an affidavit is a statement of truth so my UNCONTESTED AFFIDAVITS are the TRUTH; I’m sure this court isn’t deliberately DENYING THE TRUTH in order to FALSIFY THE RECORD!!! I’m certain it isn’t this court’s intent to FALSIFY THE RECORD AND CREATE DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS...is it??? MORRIS V NATIONAL CASH REGISTER, & GROUP V FINLETTER Defendant is likely to be the only individual, now or in the future, who is willing and able to place a sworn affidavit affirming the herein disclosed facts under penalties of perjury, into the record of this case and as such, in absence of sworn counter-affidavit signed under the penalties of perjury regarding these same facts, laws, case law and evidence, Defendant should be the only prevailing party. Morris v National Cash Register, 44 S.W. 2D 433, clearly states at point #4 that “uncontested allegations in affidavit must be accepted as true.”, and the Federal case of Group v Finletter, 108 F. Supp. 327 states, “Allegations in affidavit in support of motion must be considered as true in absence of counter-affidavit.
Law Enforcement Torture Prevention Act 2015-2016 Click here
Dictionary of Law 1893 Christianity. The system of doctrines and precepts taught by Christ; the religion founded by Christ. Christianity is said to be part of the common law. "Christianity is parcel of the laws of England; and, therefore, to reproach the Christian religion is to speak in subversion of the law." -Taylor's Case, Ventris 293 (1676). "The essential principles of natural religion and of revealed religion are a part of the common law, so that any person reviling or subverting or ridiculing them may be prosecuted at common law". -Case of Evans, 2 Burn. Ec. L. 185 (1780). The maxim can have no reference to the law of the National government, since the sources of that law are the Constitution, treaties, and acts of Congress. See Wheaton v. Peters, 8 Pet. 591 (1831). See further Law, Common; Blasphemy; Policy, 2.; Religion
THE LEGAL NAME IS "ID THEFT" BY LAWYERS/JUDGES
by UNDISCLOSED CONVERSION by use of PATENTS.
***thus - any Elected SHERIFF in this country serving "papers" for Foreclosures is committing TREASON.
- any unelected Police revenue agent in this country serving "papers" for Foreclosures is a Domestic Terrorist.
ITS THAT SIMPLE, FOLKS.
THIS IS WHY WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS
- and why an Executive Order needs to be issued as a MILITARY INJUNCTION on all THEATERS impersonating government buildings. Trafficking of IP's via SSA Securities.
WHEN JUDGE ASKS "WHAT'S YOUR NAME"?
If you're in a PRIVATE/administrative court or court in a federal region such as CA, FL, TX, etc. then giving your name will be considered as a name of a STATUTORY PERSON, consisting of a FIRST and LAST name.
BUT if you're on the land of the Republic or in a Public court of a Republic, then giving your name MUST be considered as name of a MAN, with a GIVEN and FAMILY name, who is protected by a Public/common law.
So the first question in court should be "Are we on the land of the Republic or in a Public court of the Republic?" If not, then I'd ask to see the contract. Why? Because US gov't is a FOREIGN CORPORATION with respect to a state of the Union, so in those states it ONLY has authority via a CONTRACT (unless it's interstate commerce).
Of course they'll start talking about the PEOPLE OF THE STATE, so I'd demand to know if the PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF XYZ are in the United States. And as they ARE, since courts deal ONLY with federal US regions such as CA, TX, FL, etc., then a demand for a contract is PROPER, since US gov't is a FOREIGN CORPORATION